fix broken runnableExamples for getWeeksInIsoYear (#20193)
Based on what I understand from [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date#Weeks_per_year), 2001 does not have 53 weeks, but 2004, 2009, 2015, 2020 do. The years 2000 and 2001 seem to be copy pasted from the `getDaysInYear` example above. The result of `getWeeksInIsoYear` also seem to match up with Wikipedia. That means these runnableExamples were never tested. Why is this the case? I only discovered this in #20091.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a502d7884
commit
31b7a25e1e
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -547,8 +547,8 @@ proc getWeeksInIsoYear*(y: IsoYear): IsoWeekRange {.since: (1, 5).} =
|
||||||
## Returns the number of weeks in the specified ISO 8601 week-based year, which can be
|
## Returns the number of weeks in the specified ISO 8601 week-based year, which can be
|
||||||
## either 53 or 52.
|
## either 53 or 52.
|
||||||
runnableExamples:
|
runnableExamples:
|
||||||
assert getWeeksInIsoYear(IsoYear(2000)) == 52
|
assert getWeeksInIsoYear(IsoYear(2019)) == 52
|
||||||
assert getWeeksInIsoYear(IsoYear(2001)) == 53
|
assert getWeeksInIsoYear(IsoYear(2020)) == 53
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
var y = int(y)
|
var y = int(y)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue