'lock levels' are deprecated, now a noop (#20539)
* 'lock levels' are deprecated, now a noop * fixes tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
7587371554
commit
5602183234
57 changed files with 121 additions and 372 deletions
|
|
@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ type
|
|||
gcUnsafe, isRecursive, isTopLevel, hasSideEffect, inEnforcedGcSafe: bool
|
||||
hasDangerousAssign, isInnerProc: bool
|
||||
inEnforcedNoSideEffects: bool
|
||||
maxLockLevel, currLockLevel: TLockLevel
|
||||
currOptions: TOptions
|
||||
config: ConfigRef
|
||||
graph: ModuleGraph
|
||||
|
|
@ -85,11 +84,6 @@ type
|
|||
escapingParams: IntSet
|
||||
PEffects = var TEffects
|
||||
|
||||
proc `<`(a, b: TLockLevel): bool {.borrow.}
|
||||
proc `<=`(a, b: TLockLevel): bool {.borrow.}
|
||||
proc `==`(a, b: TLockLevel): bool {.borrow.}
|
||||
proc max(a, b: TLockLevel): TLockLevel {.borrow.}
|
||||
|
||||
proc createTypeBoundOps(tracked: PEffects, typ: PType; info: TLineInfo) =
|
||||
if typ == nil: return
|
||||
when false:
|
||||
|
|
@ -107,33 +101,12 @@ proc isLocalVar(a: PEffects, s: PSym): bool =
|
|||
s.typ != nil and (s.kind in {skVar, skResult} or (s.kind == skParam and isOutParam(s.typ))) and
|
||||
sfGlobal notin s.flags and s.owner == a.owner
|
||||
|
||||
proc getLockLevel(t: PType): TLockLevel =
|
||||
var t = t
|
||||
# tyGenericInst(TLock {tyGenericBody}, tyStatic, tyObject):
|
||||
if t.kind == tyGenericInst and t.len == 3: t = t[1]
|
||||
if t.kind == tyStatic and t.n != nil and t.n.kind in {nkCharLit..nkInt64Lit}:
|
||||
result = t.n.intVal.TLockLevel
|
||||
|
||||
proc lockLocations(a: PEffects; pragma: PNode) =
|
||||
if pragma.kind != nkExprColonExpr:
|
||||
localError(a.config, pragma.info, "locks pragma without argument")
|
||||
return
|
||||
var firstLL = TLockLevel(-1'i16)
|
||||
for x in pragma[1]:
|
||||
let thisLL = getLockLevel(x.typ)
|
||||
if thisLL != 0.TLockLevel:
|
||||
if thisLL < 0.TLockLevel or thisLL > MaxLockLevel.TLockLevel:
|
||||
localError(a.config, x.info, "invalid lock level: " & $thisLL)
|
||||
elif firstLL < 0.TLockLevel: firstLL = thisLL
|
||||
elif firstLL != thisLL:
|
||||
localError(a.config, x.info,
|
||||
"multi-lock requires the same static lock level for every operand")
|
||||
a.maxLockLevel = max(a.maxLockLevel, firstLL)
|
||||
a.locked.add x
|
||||
if firstLL >= 0.TLockLevel and firstLL != a.currLockLevel:
|
||||
if a.currLockLevel > 0.TLockLevel and a.currLockLevel <= firstLL:
|
||||
localError(a.config, pragma.info, "invalid nested locking")
|
||||
a.currLockLevel = firstLL
|
||||
|
||||
proc guardGlobal(a: PEffects; n: PNode; guard: PSym) =
|
||||
# check whether the corresponding lock is held:
|
||||
|
|
@ -438,8 +411,6 @@ proc listEffects(a: PEffects) =
|
|||
for e in items(a.exc): message(a.config, e.info, hintUser, typeToString(e.typ))
|
||||
for e in items(a.tags): message(a.config, e.info, hintUser, typeToString(e.typ))
|
||||
for e in items(a.forbids): message(a.config, e.info, hintUser, typeToString(e.typ))
|
||||
#if a.maxLockLevel != 0:
|
||||
# message(e.info, hintUser, "lockLevel: " & a.maxLockLevel)
|
||||
|
||||
proc catches(tracked: PEffects, e: PType) =
|
||||
let e = skipTypes(e, skipPtrs)
|
||||
|
|
@ -551,25 +522,6 @@ proc importedFromC(n: PNode): bool =
|
|||
# when imported from C, we assume GC-safety.
|
||||
result = n.kind == nkSym and sfImportc in n.sym.flags
|
||||
|
||||
proc getLockLevel(s: PSym): TLockLevel =
|
||||
result = s.typ.lockLevel
|
||||
if result == UnspecifiedLockLevel:
|
||||
if {sfImportc, sfNoSideEffect} * s.flags != {} or
|
||||
tfNoSideEffect in s.typ.flags:
|
||||
result = 0.TLockLevel
|
||||
else:
|
||||
result = UnknownLockLevel
|
||||
#message(??.config, s.info, warnUser, "FOR THIS " & s.name.s)
|
||||
|
||||
proc mergeLockLevels(tracked: PEffects, n: PNode, lockLevel: TLockLevel) =
|
||||
if lockLevel >= tracked.currLockLevel:
|
||||
# if in lock section:
|
||||
if tracked.currLockLevel > 0.TLockLevel:
|
||||
localError tracked.config, n.info, errGenerated,
|
||||
"expected lock level < " & $tracked.currLockLevel &
|
||||
" but got lock level " & $lockLevel
|
||||
tracked.maxLockLevel = max(tracked.maxLockLevel, lockLevel)
|
||||
|
||||
proc propagateEffects(tracked: PEffects, n: PNode, s: PSym) =
|
||||
let pragma = s.ast[pragmasPos]
|
||||
let spec = effectSpec(pragma, wRaises)
|
||||
|
|
@ -583,7 +535,6 @@ proc propagateEffects(tracked: PEffects, n: PNode, s: PSym) =
|
|||
markGcUnsafe(tracked, s)
|
||||
if tfNoSideEffect notin s.typ.flags:
|
||||
markSideEffect(tracked, s, n.info)
|
||||
mergeLockLevels(tracked, n, s.getLockLevel)
|
||||
|
||||
proc procVarCheck(n: PNode; conf: ConfigRef) =
|
||||
if n.kind in nkSymChoices:
|
||||
|
|
@ -623,11 +574,6 @@ proc notNilCheck(tracked: PEffects, n: PNode, paramType: PType) =
|
|||
proc assumeTheWorst(tracked: PEffects; n: PNode; op: PType) =
|
||||
addRaiseEffect(tracked, createRaise(tracked.graph, n), nil)
|
||||
addTag(tracked, createTag(tracked.graph, n), nil)
|
||||
let lockLevel = if op.lockLevel == UnspecifiedLockLevel: UnknownLockLevel
|
||||
else: op.lockLevel
|
||||
#if lockLevel == UnknownLockLevel:
|
||||
# message(??.config, n.info, warnUser, "had to assume the worst here")
|
||||
mergeLockLevels(tracked, n, lockLevel)
|
||||
|
||||
proc isOwnedProcVar(tracked: PEffects; n: PNode): bool =
|
||||
# XXX prove the soundness of this effect system rule
|
||||
|
|
@ -885,10 +831,9 @@ proc trackCall(tracked: PEffects; n: PNode) =
|
|||
if a.kind == nkSym:
|
||||
if a.sym == tracked.owner: tracked.isRecursive = true
|
||||
# even for recursive calls we need to check the lock levels (!):
|
||||
mergeLockLevels(tracked, n, a.sym.getLockLevel)
|
||||
if sfSideEffect in a.sym.flags: markSideEffect(tracked, a, n.info)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
mergeLockLevels(tracked, n, op.lockLevel)
|
||||
discard
|
||||
var effectList = op.n[0]
|
||||
if a.kind == nkSym and a.sym.kind == skMethod:
|
||||
propagateEffects(tracked, n, a.sym)
|
||||
|
|
@ -967,7 +912,6 @@ proc trackCall(tracked: PEffects; n: PNode) =
|
|||
type
|
||||
PragmaBlockContext = object
|
||||
oldLocked: int
|
||||
oldLockLevel: TLockLevel
|
||||
enforcedGcSafety, enforceNoSideEffects: bool
|
||||
oldExc, oldTags, oldForbids: int
|
||||
exc, tags, forbids: PNode
|
||||
|
|
@ -976,7 +920,6 @@ proc createBlockContext(tracked: PEffects): PragmaBlockContext =
|
|||
var oldForbidsLen = 0
|
||||
if tracked.forbids != nil: oldForbidsLen = tracked.forbids.len
|
||||
result = PragmaBlockContext(oldLocked: tracked.locked.len,
|
||||
oldLockLevel: tracked.currLockLevel,
|
||||
enforcedGcSafety: false, enforceNoSideEffects: false,
|
||||
oldExc: tracked.exc.len, oldTags: tracked.tags.len,
|
||||
oldForbids: oldForbidsLen)
|
||||
|
|
@ -989,7 +932,6 @@ proc unapplyBlockContext(tracked: PEffects; bc: PragmaBlockContext) =
|
|||
if bc.enforcedGcSafety: tracked.inEnforcedGcSafe = false
|
||||
if bc.enforceNoSideEffects: tracked.inEnforcedNoSideEffects = false
|
||||
setLen(tracked.locked, bc.oldLocked)
|
||||
tracked.currLockLevel = bc.oldLockLevel
|
||||
if bc.exc != nil:
|
||||
# beware that 'raises: []' is very different from not saying
|
||||
# anything about 'raises' in the 'cast' at all. Same applies for 'tags'.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1396,17 +1338,6 @@ proc checkMethodEffects*(g: ModuleGraph; disp, branch: PSym) =
|
|||
localError(g.config, branch.info, "for method '" & branch.name.s &
|
||||
"' the `.requires` or `.ensures` properties are incompatible.")
|
||||
|
||||
if branch.typ.lockLevel > disp.typ.lockLevel:
|
||||
when true:
|
||||
message(g.config, branch.info, warnLockLevel,
|
||||
"base method has lock level $1, but dispatcher has $2" %
|
||||
[$branch.typ.lockLevel, $disp.typ.lockLevel])
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# XXX make this an error after bigbreak has been released:
|
||||
localError(g.config, branch.info,
|
||||
"base method has lock level $1, but dispatcher has $2" %
|
||||
[$branch.typ.lockLevel, $disp.typ.lockLevel])
|
||||
|
||||
proc setEffectsForProcType*(g: ModuleGraph; t: PType, n: PNode; s: PSym = nil) =
|
||||
var effects = t.n[0]
|
||||
if t.kind != tyProc or effects.kind != nkEffectList: return
|
||||
|
|
@ -1592,13 +1523,6 @@ proc trackProc*(c: PContext; s: PSym, body: PNode) =
|
|||
s.typ.flags.incl tfGcSafe
|
||||
if not t.hasSideEffect and sfSideEffect notin s.flags:
|
||||
s.typ.flags.incl tfNoSideEffect
|
||||
if s.typ.lockLevel == UnspecifiedLockLevel:
|
||||
s.typ.lockLevel = t.maxLockLevel
|
||||
elif t.maxLockLevel > s.typ.lockLevel:
|
||||
#localError(s.info,
|
||||
message(g.config, s.info, warnLockLevel,
|
||||
"declared lock level is $1, but real lock level is $2" %
|
||||
[$s.typ.lockLevel, $t.maxLockLevel])
|
||||
when defined(drnim):
|
||||
if c.graph.strongSemCheck != nil: c.graph.strongSemCheck(c.graph, s, body)
|
||||
when defined(useDfa):
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue