parent
33b8a00aa8
commit
560eef5bbe
3 changed files with 35 additions and 12 deletions
|
|
@ -85,7 +85,8 @@ proc getPragmaVal*(procAst: PNode; name: TSpecialWord): PNode =
|
|||
it[0].ident.id == ord(name):
|
||||
return it[1]
|
||||
|
||||
proc pragma*(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, validPragmas: TSpecialWords)
|
||||
proc pragma*(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, validPragmas: TSpecialWords;
|
||||
isStatement: bool = false)
|
||||
|
||||
proc recordPragma(c: PContext; n: PNode; key, val: string; val2 = "") =
|
||||
var recorded = newNodeI(nkCommentStmt, n.info)
|
||||
|
|
@ -747,7 +748,8 @@ proc semCustomPragma(c: PContext, n: PNode): PNode =
|
|||
result.kind = n.kind
|
||||
|
||||
proc singlePragma(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, i: var int,
|
||||
validPragmas: TSpecialWords, comesFromPush: bool) : bool =
|
||||
validPragmas: TSpecialWords,
|
||||
comesFromPush, isStatement: bool) : bool =
|
||||
var it = n.sons[i]
|
||||
var key = if it.kind in nkPragmaCallKinds and it.len > 1: it.sons[0] else: it
|
||||
if key.kind == nkBracketExpr:
|
||||
|
|
@ -767,7 +769,7 @@ proc singlePragma(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, i: var int,
|
|||
if c.instCounter > 100:
|
||||
globalError(c.config, it.info, "recursive dependency: " & userPragma.name.s)
|
||||
|
||||
pragma(c, sym, userPragma.ast, validPragmas)
|
||||
pragma(c, sym, userPragma.ast, validPragmas, isStatement)
|
||||
n.sons[i..i] = userPragma.ast.sons # expand user pragma with its content
|
||||
i.inc(userPragma.ast.len - 1) # inc by -1 is ok, user pragmas was empty
|
||||
dec c.instCounter
|
||||
|
|
@ -969,7 +971,7 @@ proc singlePragma(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, i: var int,
|
|||
recordPragma(c, it, "warning", s)
|
||||
message(c.config, it.info, warnUser, s)
|
||||
of wError:
|
||||
if sym != nil and (sym.isRoutine or sym.kind == skType) and wUsed in validPragmas:
|
||||
if sym != nil and (sym.isRoutine or sym.kind == skType) and not isStatement:
|
||||
# This is subtle but correct: the error *statement* is only
|
||||
# allowed when 'wUsed' is not in validPragmas. Here this is the easiest way to
|
||||
# distinguish properly between
|
||||
|
|
@ -1168,7 +1170,7 @@ proc implicitPragmas*(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode,
|
|||
pushInfoContext(c.config, n.info)
|
||||
var i = 0
|
||||
while i < o.len:
|
||||
if singlePragma(c, sym, o, i, validPragmas, true):
|
||||
if singlePragma(c, sym, o, i, validPragmas, true, false):
|
||||
internalError(c.config, n.info, "implicitPragmas")
|
||||
inc i
|
||||
popInfoContext(c.config)
|
||||
|
|
@ -1193,14 +1195,16 @@ proc hasPragma*(n: PNode, pragma: TSpecialWord): bool =
|
|||
|
||||
return false
|
||||
|
||||
proc pragmaRec(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, validPragmas: TSpecialWords) =
|
||||
proc pragmaRec(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, validPragmas: TSpecialWords;
|
||||
isStatement: bool) =
|
||||
if n == nil: return
|
||||
var i = 0
|
||||
while i < n.len:
|
||||
if singlePragma(c, sym, n, i, validPragmas, false): break
|
||||
if singlePragma(c, sym, n, i, validPragmas, false, isStatement): break
|
||||
inc i
|
||||
|
||||
proc pragma(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, validPragmas: TSpecialWords) =
|
||||
proc pragma(c: PContext, sym: PSym, n: PNode, validPragmas: TSpecialWords;
|
||||
isStatement: bool) =
|
||||
if n == nil: return
|
||||
pragmaRec(c, sym, n, validPragmas)
|
||||
pragmaRec(c, sym, n, validPragmas, isStatement)
|
||||
implicitPragmas(c, sym, n, validPragmas)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue