jyapayne/Nim
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

rename case statement macro from match to case (#16923)

Browse source 
* rename case statement macro from match to `case`

* fix test
This commit is contained in:
hlaaftana 2021-02-08 21:35:06 +03:00 • committed by GitHub
commit 6a7baff97d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
4 changed files with 51 additions and 16 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
compiler/semstmts.nim
View file

@ -861,10 +861,10 @@ proc handleForLoopMacro(c: PContext; n: PNode; flags: TExprFlags): PNode =
proc handleCaseStmtMacro(c: PContext; n: PNode; flags: TExprFlags): PNode =
# n[0] has been sem'checked and has a type. We use this to resolve
# 'match(n[0])' but then we pass 'n' to the 'match' macro. This seems to
# '`case`(n[0])' but then we pass 'n' to the `case` macro. This seems to
# be the best solution.
var toResolve = newNodeI(nkCall, n.info)
toResolve.add newIdentNode(getIdent(c.cache, "match"), n.info)
toResolve.add newIdentNode(getIdent(c.cache, "case"), n.info)
toResolve.add n[0]
var errors: CandidateErrors
@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ proc handleCaseStmtMacro(c: PContext; n: PNode; flags: TExprFlags): PNode =
markUsed(c, n[0].info, match)
onUse(n[0].info, match)
# but pass 'n' to the 'match' macro, not 'n[0]':
# but pass 'n' to the `case` macro, not 'n[0]':
r.call[1] = n
let toExpand = semResolvedCall(c, r, r.call, {})
case match.kind