jyapayne/Nim
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

deprecated unary '<'

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Rumpf 2017-10-29 08:37:13 +01:00
commit 70ea45cdba
56 changed files with 259 additions and 258 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
compiler/semobjconstr.nim
View file

@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ proc mergeInitStatus(existing: var InitStatus, newStatus: InitStatus) =
proc locateFieldInInitExpr(field: PSym, initExpr: PNode): PNode =
# Returns the assignment nkExprColonExpr node or nil
let fieldId = field.name.id
for i in 1 .. <initExpr.len:
for i in 1 ..< initExpr.len:
let assignment = initExpr[i]
if assignment.kind != nkExprColonExpr:
localError(initExpr.info, "incorrect object construction syntax")
@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ proc semConstructFields(c: PContext, recNode: PNode,
internalAssert discriminator.kind == nkSym
var selectedBranch = -1
for i in 1 .. <recNode.len:
for i in 1 ..< recNode.len:
let innerRecords = recNode[i]{-1}
let status = semConstructFields(c, innerRecords, initExpr, flags)
if status notin {initNone, initUnknown}:
@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ proc semConstructFields(c: PContext, recNode: PNode,
else:
# All bets are off. If any of the branches has a mandatory
# fields we must produce an error:
for i in 1 .. <recNode.len: checkMissingFields recNode[i]
for i in 1 ..< recNode.len: checkMissingFields recNode[i]
of nkSym:
let field = recNode.sym
@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ proc semObjConstr(c: PContext, n: PNode, flags: TExprFlags): PNode =
# Since we were traversing the object fields, it's possible that
# not all of the fields specified in the constructor was visited.
# We'll check for such fields here:
for i in 1.. <result.len:
for i in 1..<result.len:
let field = result[i]
if nfSem notin field.flags:
if field.kind != nkExprColonExpr:
@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ proc semObjConstr(c: PContext, n: PNode, flags: TExprFlags): PNode =
let id = considerQuotedIdent(field[0])
# This node was not processed. There are two possible reasons:
# 1) It was shadowed by a field with the same name on the left
for j in 1 .. <i:
for j in 1 ..< i:
let prevId = considerQuotedIdent(result[j][0])
if prevId.id == id.id:
localError(field.info, errFieldInitTwice, id.s)