remove caas

tests/caas/absurd_nesting.nim

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-# Tries to test the full ownership path generated by idetools.
-
-proc lev1(t1: string) =
-  var temp = t1
-  for i in 0..len(temp)-1:
-    temp[i] = chr(int(temp[i]) + 1)
-
-  proc lev2(t2: string) =
-    var temp = t2
-    for i in 0..len(temp)-1:
-      temp[i] = chr(int(temp[i]) + 1)
-
-    proc lev3(t3: string) =
-      var temp = t3
-      for i in 0..len(temp)-1:
-        temp[i] = chr(int(temp[i]) + 1)
-
-      proc lev4(t4: string) =
-        var temp = t4
-        for i in 0..len(temp)-1:
-          temp[i] = chr(int(temp[i]) + 1)
-
-        echo temp & "(lev4)"
-      lev4(temp & "(lev3)")
-    lev3(temp & "(lev2)")
-  lev2(temp & "(lev1)")
-
-when isMainModule:
-  lev1("abcd")

tests/caas/absurd_nesting.txt

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-absurd_nesting.nim
-
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,6,6 --def $SILENT
-skVar\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.temp\tstring
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,21,13 --def $SILENT
-skVar\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.lev2.lev3.lev4.temp\tstring
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,6,27 --def $SILENT
-skForVar\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.i\tint
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,21,33 --def $SILENT
-skForVar\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.lev1.lev3.lev4.i\tint
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,24,8 --def $SILENT
-skProc\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.lev1.lev3.lev4\tproc \(string\)
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,4,13 --def $SILENT
-skParam\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.t1\tstring
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,4,13 --def $SILENT
-skParam\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.t1\tstring
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,19,19 --def $SILENT
-skParam\tabsurd_nesting.lev1.lev2.lev3.lev4.t4\tstring
-

tests/caas/basic-recompile.txt

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-main.nim
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-# The "Processing" string will be found always in proc mode since each
-# compilation command will generate it. We need to test it only in Caas mode to
-# verify the server is not recompiling again the file.
-CaasRun > c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-CaasRun ! Processing
-CaasRun SuccessX
-

tests/caas/compile-suggest.txt

@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-main.nim
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-> idetools --trackDirty:main_dirty.nim,$TESTNIM,12,7 --suggest $SILENT
-skField\tx
-skField\ty
-

tests/caas/compile-then-def.txt

@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-main.nim
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,18 --def --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-strutils.toUpper
-! SuccessX
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,18 --def --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-strutils.toUpper
-! SuccessX

tests/caas/completion_dot_syntax.txt

@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-completion_dot_syntax_main.nim
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,24,15 --def
-def\tskProc\t$MODULE.echoRemainingDollars
-> idetools --trackDirty:completion_dot_syntax_dirty.nim,$TESTNIM,25,12 --suggest
-sug\tskProc\techoRemainingDollars
-# The suggestion should not mention the other echoRemaining* variants.
-!echoRemainingEuros
-!echoRemainingBugs
-

tests/caas/completion_dot_syntax_dirty.nim

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-import strutils
-
-# Verifies if the --suggestion switch differentiates types for dot notation.
-
-type
-  TDollar = distinct int
-  TEuro = distinct int
-
-proc echoRemainingDollars(amount: TDollar) =
-  echo "You have $1 dollars" % [$int(amount)]
-
-proc echoRemainingEuros(amount: TEuro) =
-  echo "You have $1 euros" % [$int(amount)]
-
-proc echoRemainingBugs() =
-  echo "You still have bugs"
-
-proc main =
-  var
-    d: TDollar
-    e: TEuro
-  d = TDollar(23)
-  e = TEuro(32)
-  d.echoRemainingDollars()
-  e.echoRemai

tests/caas/completion_dot_syntax_main.nim

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-import strutils
-
-# Verifies if the --suggestion switch differentiates types for dot notation.
-
-type
-  TDollar = distinct int
-  TEuro = distinct int
-
-proc echoRemainingDollars(amount: TDollar) =
-  echo "You have $1 dollars" % [$int(amount)]
-
-proc echoRemainingEuros(amount: TEuro) =
-  echo "You have $1 euros" % [$int(amount)]
-
-proc echoRemainingBugs() =
-  echo "You still have bugs"
-
-proc main =
-  var
-    d: TDollar
-    e: TEuro
-  d = TDollar(23)
-  e = TEuro(32)
-  d.echoRemainingDollars()

tests/caas/def-def-compile.txt

@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-main.nim
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,18 --def --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-strutils.toUpper
-! SuccessX
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,18 --def --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-strutils.toUpper
-! SuccessX
-
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-

tests/caas/def-then-compile.txt

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-main.nim
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,18 --def --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-strutils.toUpper
-! SuccessX
-
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-

tests/caas/forward_declarations.nim

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-# This example shows that idetools returns an empty signature for a forward
-# declared proc in proc/symproc runs, but correctly returns the full signature
-# in caas mode.
-
-proc echoHello(text: string)
-
-proc testForward() =
-  echo "T"
-  echoHello("T")
-
-proc echoHello(text: string) =
-  echo "Hello Mr." & text
-
-when isMainModule:
-  testForward()

tests/caas/forward_declarations.txt

@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-forward_declarations.nim
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,9,5 --def $SILENT
-skProc
-proc \(string\)
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,9 --def $SILENT
-skProc
-proc \(string\)

tests/caas/forward_usages.txt

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-forward_declarations.nim
-
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-
-# None of the following return three instances of the echoHello proc, the first
-# being the forward declaration, the second being the usage inside testForward,
-# and the third being the actual implementation.
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,5 --usages $SILENT
-skProc.*\n.*skProc.*\n.*skProc
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,9,5 --usages $SILENT
-skProc.*\n.*skProc.*\n.*skProc
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,11,5 --usages $SILENT
-skProc.*\n.*skProc.*\n.*skProc

tests/caas/idetools_api.nim

@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
-import unicode, sequtils, macros, re
-
-proc test_enums() =
-  var o: Tfile
-  if o.open("files " & "test.txt", fmWrite):
-    o.write("test")
-    o.close()
-
-proc test_iterators(filename = "tests.nim") =
-  let
-    input = readFile(filename)
-    letters = toSeq(runes(string(input)))
-  for letter in letters: echo int(letter)
-
-const SOME_SEQUENCE = @[1, 2]
-type
-  bad_string = distinct string
-  TPerson = object of TObject
-    name*: bad_string
-    age: int
-
-proc adder(a, b: int): int =
-  result = a + b
-
-type
-  PExpr = ref object of TObject ## abstract base class for an expression
-  PLiteral = ref object of PExpr
-    x: int
-  PPlusExpr = ref object of PExpr
-    a, b: PExpr
-
-# watch out: 'eval' relies on dynamic binding
-method eval(e: PExpr): int =
-  # override this base method
-  quit "to override!"
-
-method eval(e: PLiteral): int = e.x
-method eval(e: PPlusExpr): int = eval(e.a) + eval(e.b)
-
-proc newLit(x: int): PLiteral = PLiteral(x: x)
-proc newPlus(a, b: PExpr): PPlusExpr = PPlusExpr(a: a, b: b)
-
-echo eval(newPlus(newPlus(newLit(1), newLit(2)), newLit(4)))
-
-proc findVowelPosition(text: string) =
-  var found = -1
-  block loops:
-    for i, letter in pairs(text):
-      for j in ['a', 'e', 'i', 'o', 'u']:
-        if letter == j:
-          found = i
-          break loops # leave both for-loops
-  echo found
-
-findVowelPosition("Zerg") # should output 1, position of vowel.
-
-macro expect*(exceptions: varargs[expr], body: stmt): stmt {.immediate.} =
-  ## Expect docstrings
-  let exp = callsite()
-  template expectBody(errorTypes, lineInfoLit: expr,
-                      body: stmt): NimNode {.dirty.} =
-    try:
-      body
-      assert false
-    except errorTypes:
-      nil
-
-  var body = exp[exp.len - 1]
-
-  var errorTypes = newNimNode(nnkBracket)
-  for i in countup(1, exp.len - 2):
-    errorTypes.add(exp[i])
-
-  result = getAst(expectBody(errorTypes, exp.lineinfo, body))
-
-proc err =
-  raise newException(EArithmetic, "some exception")
-
-proc testMacro() =
-  expect(EArithmetic):
-    err()
-
-testMacro()
-let notAModule = re"(\w+)=(.*)"

tests/caas/idetools_api.txt

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-idetools_api.nim
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,4,11 --def $SILENT
-def\tskType\tsystem.TFile\tTFile
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,7 --def $SILENT
-def\tskProc\tsystem.Open\tproc \(var TFile, string, TFileMode, int\): bool
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,21 --def $SILENT
-def\tskProc\tsystem.\&\tproc \(string, string\): string\{.noSideEffect.\}
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,5,38 --def $SILENT
-def\tskEnumField\tsystem.TFileMode.fmWrite\tTFileMode
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,7,6 --def $SILENT
-def\tskProc\tsystem.Close\tproc \(TFile\)
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,23 --def $SILENT
-def\tskIterator\tunicode.runes\titerator \(string\): TRune
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,15 --def $SILENT
-def\tskTemplate\tsequtils.toSeq\tproc \(expr\): expr
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,15,7 --def $SILENT
-
-# ProcRun mode will fail the next line, because the type is returned empty.
-def\tskConst\t$MODULE.SOME_SEQUENCE\tseq\[int\]\t
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,15,23 --def $SILENT
-def\tskProc\tsystem.@\tproc \(array\[IDX, T\]\): seq\[T\]\{.noSideEffect.\}
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,17,3 --def $SILENT
-
-# ProcRun mode will fail the next line, because the type is returned empty.
-def\tskType\t$MODULE.bad_string\tbad_string\t
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,11,24 --def $SILENT
-def\tskParam\t$MODULE.test_iterators.filename\tstring
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,6,5 --def $SILENT
-def\tskVar\t$MODULE.test_enums.o\tTFile
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,34 --def $SILENT
-def\tskLet\t$MODULE.test_iterators.input\tTaintedString
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,13,35 --def $SILENT
-def\tskForVar\t$MODULE.test_iterators.letter\tTRune
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,23,3 --def $SILENT
-def\tskResult\t$MODULE.adder.result\tint
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,19,6 --def $SILENT
-
-# ProcRun mode will fail the next line, because the type is returned empty.
-def\tskField\t$MODULE.TPerson.name\tbad_string\t
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,43,7 --def $SILENT
-def\tskMethod\t$MODULE.eval\tproc \(PPlusExpr\): int\t
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,47,8 --def $SILENT
-def\tskLabel\t$MODULE.findVowelPosition.loops\t\t
-# For some reason the use of the label with break displaces its position.
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,52,16 --def $SILENT
-def\tskLabel\t$MODULE.findVowelPosition.loops\t\t
-
-# Displaced macro usage by one character.
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,80,2 --def $SILENT
-def\tskMacro\t$MODULE.expect\tproc \(varargs\[expr\], stmt\): stmt\t
-
-# The syntax for extended raw string literals should not be returned as module
-# but as the proc re() inside the re module.
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,84,17 --def $SILENT
-!def\tskModule

tests/caas/imported.nim

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-proc `+++`*(a,b: string): string =
-  return a & "  " & b
-

tests/caas/issue_416_template_shift.nim

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-import unicode, sequtils
-
-proc test() =
-  let input = readFile("weird.nim")
-  for letter in runes(string(input)):
-    echo int(letter)
-
-when 1 > 0:
-  proc failtest() =
-    let
-      input = readFile("weird.nim")
-      letters = toSeq(runes(string(input)))
-    for letter in letters:
-      echo int(letter)
-
-when isMainModule:
-  test()

tests/caas/issue_416_template_shift.txt

@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
-issue_416_template_shift.nim
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,28 --def $SILENT
-def\tskType\tsystem.string\tstring
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,35 --def $SILENT
-def\tskLet\t$MODULE.failtest.input\tTaintedString
-
-# The following fail because they seem shifted one column to the right.
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,16 --def $SILENT
-def\tskTemplate\tsequtils.toSeq\tproc \(expr\): expr
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,22 --def $SILENT
-def\tskIterator\tunicode.runes\titerator \(string\): TRune
-

tests/caas/issue_452_export_shift.nim

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-const
-  VERSION_STR1* = "0.5.0" ## Idetools shifts this one column.
-  VERSION_STR2 = "0.5.0" ## This one is ok.
-  VERSION_STR3* = "0.5.0" ## Bad.
-  VERSION_STR4 = "0.5.0" ## Ok.
-
-proc forward1*(): string = result = ""
-proc forward2(): string = result = ""

tests/caas/issue_452_export_shift.txt

@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-issue_452_export_shift.nim
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,2,2 --def $SILENT
-def\tskConst\t$MODULE.VERSION_STR1\tstring
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,3,2 --def $SILENT
-def\tskConst\t$MODULE.VERSION_STR2\tstring
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,7,5 --def $SILENT
-def\tskProc\t$MODULE.forward1\tproc \(\): string\t
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,8,5 --def $SILENT
-def\tskProc\t$MODULE.forward2\tproc \(\): string\t

tests/caas/issue_477_dynamic_dispatch.nim

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-type
-  TThing = object of TObject
-  TUnit = object of TThing
-    x: int
-
-method collide(a, b: TThing) {.inline.} =
-  quit "to override!"
-
-method collide(a: TThing, b: TUnit) {.inline.} =
-  echo "collide1"
-
-method collide(a: TUnit, b: TThing) {.inline.} =
-  echo "collide2"
-
-var
-  a, b: TUnit
-
-when isMainModule:
-  collide(a, b) # output: 2

tests/caas/issue_477_dynamic_dispatch.txt

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-issue_477_dynamic_dispatch.nim
-> c --run
-SuccessX
-> idetools --track:issue_477_dynamic_dispatch.nim,19,5 --def $SILENT
-def\tskMethod\tissue_477_dynamic_dispatch.collide\tproc \(TUnit, TThing\)\{.inline.\}

tests/caas/its_full_of_procs.nim

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-import unicode, sequtils
-
-# This example shows that idetools returns proc as signature for everything
-# which can be called. While a clever person would use the second column to
-# differentiate between procs, methods and others, why does the output contain
-# incorrect information?
-
-type
-  TThing = object of TObject
-  TUnit = object of TThing
-    x: int
-
-method collide(a, b: TThing) {.inline.} =
-  quit "to override!"
-
-method collide(a: TThing, b: TUnit) {.inline.} =
-  echo "1"
-
-method collide(a: TUnit, b: TThing) {.inline.} =
-  echo "2"
-
-var
-  a, b: TUnit
-
-let
-  input = readFile("its_full_of_procs.nim")
-  letters = toSeq(runes(string(input)))
-
-collide(a, b) # output: 2

tests/caas/its_full_of_procs.txt

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-its_full_of_procs.nim
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,26,15 --def $SILENT
-skProc
-proc \(
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,27,21 --def $SILENT
-skIterator
-iterator \(
-!proc \(
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,29,0 --def $SILENT
-skMethod
-method \(
-!proc \(
-
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,27,15 --def $SILENT
-skTemplate
-template \(
-!proc \(

tests/caas/main.nim

@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-import imported, strutils
-
-proc main =
-  var t1 = "text"
-  var t2 = t1.toUpper
-  echo(t1 +++ t2)
-

tests/caas/main_dirty.nim

@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
-import imported, strutils
-
-type
-  TFoo = object
-    x: int
-    y: string
-
-proc main =
-  var t1 = "text"
-  var t2 = t1.toUpper
-  var foo = TFoo(x: 10, y: "test")
-  foo.
-  echo(t1 +++ t2)
-

tests/caas/suggest-compile.txt

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-main.nim
-# This example shows how the suggest feature can be used on a partial file
-# using the --trackDirty switch.
-> idetools --trackDirty:main_dirty.nim,$TESTNIM,12,7 --suggest $SILENT
-skField\tx
-skField\ty
-# Repeating the query in caas should work always and retrieve same output.
-CaasRun > idetools --trackDirty:main_dirty.nim,$TESTNIM,12,7 --suggest $SILENT
-CaasRun skField\tx
-CaasRun skField\ty
-> c --verbosity:0 --hints:on
-SuccessX
-

tests/caas/suggest-invalid-source.txt

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-main_dirty.nim
-# A variant of the suggest-compile.txt, instead of using a "base" correct
-# source, this one uses the "broken" main_dirty.nim which won't compile. The
-# test tries to stress idetools to still provide a valid answer if possible,
-# and at least provide the same output with repeated queries rather than dying
-# after the first compilation error.
-
-# The first query should work and provide valid suggestions.
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,6 --suggest $SILENT
-skField\tx
-skField\ty
-
-# Repeating the query should work too.
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,6 --suggest $SILENT
-skField\tx
-skField\ty
-
-# Expect now a compilation failure.
-> c
-!SuccessX
-invalid indentation
-
-# Repeating suggestions *after broken compilation* should work too.
-> idetools --track:$TESTNIM,12,6 --suggest $SILENT
-skField\tx
-skField\ty