Error -> Defect for defects (#13908)
* Error -> Defect for defects The distinction between Error and Defect is subjective, context-dependent and somewhat arbitrary, so when looking at an exception, it's hard to guess what it is - this happens often when looking at a `raises` list _without_ opening the corresponding definition and digging through layers of inheritance. With the help of a little consistency in naming, it's at least possible to start disentangling the two error types and the standard lib can set a good example here.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd9af6b804
commit
7d6cbf290a
92 changed files with 323 additions and 300 deletions
|
|
@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ proc main() =
|
|||
# shows that checkNotZero won't be called if a nil is found earlier in chain
|
||||
doAssert ?.a.x1.checkNotZero == 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
# checks that a chain without nil but with an empty seq still throws IndexError
|
||||
doAssertRaises(IndexError): discard ?.a2.x8[3]
|
||||
# checks that a chain without nil but with an empty seq still throws IndexDefect
|
||||
doAssertRaises(IndexDefect): discard ?.a2.x8[3]
|
||||
|
||||
# make sure no double evaluation bug
|
||||
doAssert witness == 0
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue