versioning for GTK wrappers
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d6de1cf90
commit
e62a02d5af
3 changed files with 6 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ when defined(windows):
|
|||
gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0-0.dll"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
const
|
||||
gliblib = "libglib-2.0.so"
|
||||
gmodulelib = "libgmodule-2.0.so"
|
||||
gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0.so"
|
||||
gliblib = "libglib-2.0.so(|.0)"
|
||||
gmodulelib = "libgmodule-2.0.so(|.0)"
|
||||
gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0.so(|.0)"
|
||||
# gthreadlib = "libgthread-2.0.so"
|
||||
|
||||
type
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ elif defined(darwin):
|
|||
# linklib atk-1.0.0
|
||||
else:
|
||||
const
|
||||
lib = "libgtk-x11-2.0.so"
|
||||
lib = "libgtk-x11-2.0.so(|.0)"
|
||||
|
||||
const
|
||||
MAX_COMPOSE_LEN* = 7
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -53,10 +53,9 @@ and their interactions are subject to change.
|
|||
How fast is Nimrod?
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
Benchmarks have not been ported yet and support for threads is missing. But in
|
||||
the worst case, you can get exactly the same performance as in C if you decide
|
||||
the worst case, you can get the same performance as in C if you decide
|
||||
to write as low-level Nimrod code as C requires you to do. That said the only
|
||||
overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years (and is
|
||||
significantly faster than the Boehm GC).
|
||||
overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Compilation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue