jyapayne/Nim
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

versioning for GTK wrappers

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Rumpf 2010-03-20 20:13:14 +01:00
commit e62a02d5af
3 changed files with 6 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
lib/wrappers/gtk/glib2.nim
View file

@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ when defined(windows):
gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0-0.dll" gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0-0.dll"
else: else:
const const
gliblib = "libglib-2.0.so" gliblib = "libglib-2.0.so(|.0)"
gmodulelib = "libgmodule-2.0.so" gmodulelib = "libgmodule-2.0.so(|.0)"
gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0.so" gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0.so(|.0)"
# gthreadlib = "libgthread-2.0.so" # gthreadlib = "libgthread-2.0.so"
type type

2
lib/wrappers/gtk/gtk2.nim
View file

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ elif defined(darwin):
# linklib atk-1.0.0 # linklib atk-1.0.0
else: else:
const const
lib = "libgtk-x11-2.0.so" lib = "libgtk-x11-2.0.so(|.0)"
const const
MAX_COMPOSE_LEN* = 7 MAX_COMPOSE_LEN* = 7

5
web/question.txt
View file

@ -53,10 +53,9 @@ and their interactions are subject to change.
How fast is Nimrod? How fast is Nimrod?
------------------- -------------------
Benchmarks have not been ported yet and support for threads is missing. But in Benchmarks have not been ported yet and support for threads is missing. But in
the worst case, you can get exactly the same performance as in C if you decide the worst case, you can get the same performance as in C if you decide
to write as low-level Nimrod code as C requires you to do. That said the only to write as low-level Nimrod code as C requires you to do. That said the only
overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years (and is overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years.
significantly faster than the Boehm GC).
Compilation Compilation