fixes #100
This commit is contained in:
parent
ff4a69b624
commit
e88123fb17
3 changed files with 11 additions and 9 deletions
16
todo.txt
16
todo.txt
|
|
@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ version 0.9.0
|
|||
- implement the high level optimizer
|
||||
- change overloading resolution
|
||||
- implement proper coroutines
|
||||
- implement ``partial`` pragma for partial evaluation
|
||||
- implement ``partial`` pragma for partial evaluation; ``hoist`` pragma for
|
||||
loop hoisting
|
||||
- we need to support iteration of 2 different data structures in parallel
|
||||
- make exceptions compatible with C++ exceptions
|
||||
- 'const' objects including case objects
|
||||
|
|
@ -28,6 +29,12 @@ version 0.9.0
|
|||
changes that people want; may turn out to be a bad idea
|
||||
- activate more thread tests
|
||||
- optimize method dispatchers
|
||||
- rethink the syntax: distinction between expr and stmt is unfortunate;
|
||||
indentation handling is quite complex too; problem with exception handling
|
||||
is that often the scope of ``try`` is wrong and apart from that ``try`` is
|
||||
a full blown statement; a ``try`` expression might be a good idea to make
|
||||
error handling more light-weight
|
||||
people also want ``inc a; inc b``
|
||||
|
||||
Bugs
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
|
@ -168,11 +175,4 @@ Version 2
|
|||
a generalized case statement looks like:
|
||||
|
||||
case x with `=~`
|
||||
|
||||
- rethink the syntax: distinction between expr and stmt is unfortunate;
|
||||
indentation handling is quite complex too; problem with exception handling
|
||||
is that often the scope of ``try`` is wrong and apart from that ``try`` is
|
||||
a full blown statement; a ``try`` expression might be a good idea to make
|
||||
error handling more light-weight
|
||||
people also want ``inc a; inc b``
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue