jyapayne/Nim
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

not nil types are illegal to construct through default(T)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Zahary Karadjov 2020-03-29 02:34:50 +02:00 • committed by Andreas Rumpf
commit f3be5a716f
2 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
tests/constructors/tinvalid_construction.nim
View file

@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ type
THasNotNilsRef = ref THasNotNils
TRefObjNotNil = TRefObj not nil
TChoice = enum A, B, C, D, E, F
TBaseHasNotNils = object of THasNotNils
@ -84,6 +86,9 @@ proc userDefinedDefault(T: typedesc): T =
# with constructing requiresInit types
discard
proc genericDefault(T: typedesc): T =
result = default(T)
accept TObj()
accept TObj(choice: A)
reject TObj(choice: A, bc: 10) # bc is in the wrong branch
@ -102,9 +107,18 @@ accept THasNotNils(a: notNilRef, b: notNilRef, c: nilRef)
reject THasNotNils(b: notNilRef, c: notNilRef) # there is a missing not nil field
reject THasNotNils() # again, missing fields
accept THasNotNils(a: notNilRef, b: notNilRef) # it's OK to omit a non-mandatory field
reject default(THasNotNils)
reject userDefinedDefault(THasNotNils)
reject default(TRefObjNotNil)
reject userDefinedDefault(TRefObjNotNil)
reject genericDefault(TRefObjNotNil)
# missing not nils in base
reject TBaseHasNotNils()
reject default(TBaseHasNotNils)
reject userDefinedDefault(TBaseHasNotNils)
reject genericDefault(TBaseHasNotNils)
# once you take care of them, it's ok
accept TBaseHasNotNils(a: notNilRef, b: notNilRef, choice: D)