Removed more extraneous code tags from docs.

docs/source/doc/kaleidoscope/PythonLangImpl4.rst

@@ -403,13 +403,11 @@ example, we can create a C file with the following simple function:
    #include <stdio.h>
    
    double putchard(double x) { 
-      putchar((char)x); return 0; } {%
-   endhighlight %}
+      putchar((char)x); return 0; } 
    
    We can then compile this into a shared library with GCC:
    
-    gcc -shared -fPIC -o putchard.so putchard.c {%
-   endhighlight %}
+    gcc -shared -fPIC -o putchard.so putchard.c 
    
    Now we can load this library into the Python process using
    ``llvm.core.load_library_permanently`` and access it from Kaleidoscope

docs/source/doc/kaleidoscope/PythonLangImpl5.rst

@@ -601,8 +601,7 @@ expression for the loop value:
 .. code-block:: python
 
    def CodeGen(self): # Emit the start code first,
-   without 'variable' in scope. start_value = self.start.CodeGen() {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   without 'variable' in scope. start_value = self.start.CodeGen() 
    
    With this out of the way, the next step is to set up the LLVM basic
    block for the start of the loop body. In the case above, the whole loop

docs/source/doc/kaleidoscope/PythonLangImpl6.rst

@@ -91,8 +91,7 @@ keywords:
    BinaryToken(object): pass class UnaryToken(object): pass ... def
    Tokenize(string): ... elif identifier == 'in': yield InToken() elif
    identifier == 'binary': yield BinaryToken() elif identifier == 'unary':
-   yield UnaryToken() else: yield IdentifierToken(identifier) {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   yield UnaryToken() else: yield IdentifierToken(identifier) 
    
    This just adds lexer support for the unary and binary keywords, like we
    did in `previous chapters <PythonLangImpl5.html#iflexer>`_. One nice
@@ -446,8 +445,7 @@ denser the character:
    ' else if d > 4 then putchard(46) # '.' else if d > 2 then putchard(43)
    # '+' else putchard(42); # '*' ... ready> printdensity(1):
    printdensity(2): printdensity(3) : printdensity(4): printdensity(5):
-   printdensity(9): putchard(10)*\ ++.. Evaluated to 0.000000 {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   printdensity(9): putchard(10)*\ ++.. Evaluated to 0.000000 
    
    Based on these simple primitive operations, we can start to define more
    interesting things. For example, here's a little function that solves

docs/source/doc/kaleidoscope/PythonLangImpl7.rst

@@ -350,8 +350,7 @@ from the stack slot:
    def CodeGen(self): if self.name in
    g_named_values: return
    g_llvm_builder.load(g_named_values[self.name], self.name) else:
-   raise RuntimeError('Unknown variable name: ' + self.name) {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   raise RuntimeError('Unknown variable name: ' + self.name) 
    
    As you can see, this is pretty straightforward. Now we need to update
    the things that define the variables to set up the alloca. We'll start
@@ -431,8 +430,7 @@ get good codegen once again:
    g_llvm_pass_manager.add(PASS_PROMOTE_MEMORY_TO_REGISTER) # Do
    simple "peephole" optimizations and bit-twiddling optzns.
    g_llvm_pass_manager.add(PASS_INSTRUCTION_COMBINING) # Reassociate
-   expressions. g_llvm_pass_manager.add(PASS_REASSOCIATE) {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   expressions. g_llvm_pass_manager.add(PASS_REASSOCIATE) 
    
    It is interesting to see what the code looks like before and after the
    mem2reg optimization runs. For example, this is the before/after code
@@ -448,8 +446,7 @@ get good codegen once again:
    %subtmp5 = fsub double %x4, 2.000000e+00 %calltmp6 = call double
    @fib(double %subtmp5) %addtmp = fadd double %calltmp, %calltmp6 br label
    %ifcont ifcont: ; preds = %else, %then %iftmp = phi double [
-   1.000000e+00, %then ], [ %addtmp, %else ] ret double %iftmp } {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   1.000000e+00, %then ], [ %addtmp, %else ] ret double %iftmp } 
    
    Here there is only one variable (x, the input argument) but you can
    still see the extremely simple-minded code generation strategy we are
@@ -517,8 +514,7 @@ step is to set a precedence:
    def main(): ... # Install standard binary
    operators. # 1 is lowest possible precedence. 40 is the highest.
    g_binop_precedence['='] = 2 g_binop_precedence['<'] = 10
-   g_binop_precedence['+'] = 20 g_binop_precedence['-'] = 20 {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   g_binop_precedence['+'] = 20 g_binop_precedence['-'] = 20 
    
    Now that the parser knows the precedence of the binary operator, it
    takes care of all the parsing and AST generation. We just need to
@@ -529,8 +525,7 @@ step is to set a precedence:
    special case for '=' because we don't want to emit the LHS as an #
    expression. if self.operator == '=': # Assignment requires the LHS to be
    an identifier. if not isinstance(self.left, VariableExpressionNode):
-   raise RuntimeError('Destination of "=" must be a variable.') {%
-   endhighlight %}
+   raise RuntimeError('Destination of "=" must be a variable.') 
    
    Unlike the rest of the binary operators, our assignment operator doesn't
    follow the "emit LHS, emit RHS, do computation" model. As such, it is