Report errors in preprocessor expressions by default
Until now SWIG quietly ignored such errors unless -Wextra (or -Wall which implies -Wextra) was passed, but this is unhelpful as it hides problems. To illustrate this point, enabling this warning by default revealled a typo in the preproc_defined.i testcase in SWIG's own testsuite. If you really don't want to see this warning, you can suppress it with command line option -w202 or by using this in your interface file: %warnfilter(SWIGWARN_PP_EVALUATION); Both will work with older versions of SWIG too. Fixes #1465 Fixes #2389
This commit is contained in:
parent
befcd1bf58
commit
06296a7128
7 changed files with 34 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -7,6 +7,23 @@ the issue number to the end of the URL: https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/
|
|||
Version 4.1.0 (in progress)
|
||||
===========================
|
||||
|
||||
2022-10-05: olly
|
||||
#1465 Report errors in preprocessor expressions by default
|
||||
|
||||
Until now SWIG quietly ignored such errors unless -Wextra (or -Wall
|
||||
which implies -Wextra) was passed, but this is unhelpful as it tends
|
||||
to hide genuine problems. To illustrate this point, enabling this
|
||||
warning by default revealed a typo in the preproc_defined.i
|
||||
testcase in SWIG's own testsuite.
|
||||
|
||||
If you really don't want to see this warning, you can suppress it
|
||||
with command line option -w202 or by using this in your interface
|
||||
file:
|
||||
|
||||
%warnfilter(SWIGWARN_PP_EVALUATION);
|
||||
|
||||
Both will work with older versions of SWIG too.
|
||||
|
||||
2022-10-04: olly
|
||||
#1050 Consistently define SWIG_VERSION both at SWIG-time and in
|
||||
the generated wrapper. Best practice remains to check at SWIG-time
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue