The great merge

git-svn-id: https://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/swig/trunk@4141 626c5289-ae23-0410-ae9c-e8d60b6d4f22
This commit is contained in:
Dave Beazley 2002-11-30 22:01:28 +00:00
commit 516036631c
1508 changed files with 125983 additions and 44037 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
TOP = ../..
SWIG = $(TOP)/../swig
SRCS = example.c
TARGET = example
INTERFACE = example.i
all::
$(MAKE) -f $(TOP)/Makefile SRCS='$(SRCS)' SWIG='$(SWIG)' \
TARGET='$(TARGET)' INTERFACE='$(INTERFACE)' guile
static::
$(MAKE) -f $(TOP)/Makefile SRCS='$(SRCS)' SWIG='$(SWIG)' \
TARGET='my-guile' INTERFACE='$(INTERFACE)' guile_static
clean::
$(MAKE) -f $(TOP)/Makefile TARGET='$(TARGET)' guile_clean
check: all

View file

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
void divide_l(int a, int b, int *quotient_p, int *remainder_p)
{
*quotient_p = a/b;
*remainder_p = a%b;
}
void divide_v(int a, int b, int *quotient_p, int *remainder_p)
{
*quotient_p = a/b;
*remainder_p = a%b;
}
void divide_mv(int a, int b, int *quotient_p, int *remainder_p)
{
*quotient_p = a/b;
*remainder_p = a%b;
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
/* -*- c -*- */
%module example;
/* Multiple values as lists. By default, if more than one value is to
be returned, a list of the values is created and returned; to switch
back to this behavior, use: */
%values_as_list;
void divide_l(int a, int b, int *OUTPUT, int *OUTPUT);
/* Multiple values as vectors. By issueing: */
%values_as_vector;
/* vectors instead of lists will be used. */
void divide_v(int a, int b, int *OUTPUT, int *OUTPUT);
/* Multiple values for multiple-value continuations.
(This is the most elegant way.) By issueing: */
%multiple_values;
/* multiple values are passed to the multiple-value
continuation, as created by `call-with-values' or the
convenience macro `receive'. (See the Scheme file.) */
void divide_mv(int a, int b, int *OUTPUT, int *OUTPUT);

View file

@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
;;;; Show the three different ways to deal with multiple return values
(use-modules (example))
;;; Multiple values as lists. By default, if more than one value is to
;;; be returned, a list of the values is created and returned. The
;;; procedure divide-l does so:
(let* ((quotient/remainder (divide-l 37 5))
;; divide-l returns a list of the two values, so get them:
(quotient (car quotient/remainder))
(remainder (cadr quotient/remainder)))
(display "37 divided by 5 is ")
(display quotient)
(display ", remainder ")
(display remainder)
(newline))
;;; Multiple values as vectors. You can get vectors instead of lists
;;; if you want:
(let* ((quotient-remainder-vector (divide-v 40 7))
;; divide-v returns a vector of two values, so get them:
(quotient (vector-ref quotient-remainder-vector 0))
(remainder (vector-ref quotient-remainder-vector 1)))
(display "40 divided by 7 is ")
(display quotient)
(display ", remainder ")
(display remainder)
(newline))
;;; Multiple values for multiple-value continuations. (The most
;;; elegant way.) You can get multiple values passed to the
;;; multiple-value continuation, as created by `call-with-values'.
(call-with-values (lambda ()
;; the "producer" procedure
(divide-mv 91 13))
(lambda (quotient remainder)
;; the "consumer" procedure
(display "91 divided by 13 is ")
(display quotient)
(display ", remainder ")
(display remainder)
(newline)))
;;; SRFI-8 has a very convenient macro for this construction:
(use-modules (srfi srfi-8))
;;; If your Guile is too old, you can define the receive macro yourself:
;;;
;;; (define-macro (receive vars vals . body)
;;; `(call-with-values (lambda () ,vals)
;;; (lambda ,vars ,@body)))
(receive (quotient remainder)
(divide-mv 111 19) ; the "producer" form
;; In the body, `quotient' and `remainder' are bound to the two
;; values.
(display "111 divided by 19 is ")
(display quotient)
(display ", remainder ")
(display remainder)
(newline))