More consistent formatting of examples in documentation
This commit is contained in:
parent
04131a988f
commit
5779aa8d79
4 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -2565,9 +2565,9 @@ the function callback in the tp_hash slot for the builtin type for <tt>MyClass</
|
|||
<div class="code">
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
static PyHeapTypeObject SwigPyBuiltin__MyClass_type = {
|
||||
...
|
||||
(hashfunc) myHashFunc, /* tp_hash */
|
||||
...
|
||||
...
|
||||
(hashfunc) myHashFunc, /* tp_hash */
|
||||
...
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -3087,7 +3087,7 @@ references. Here is an example:
|
|||
<pre>
|
||||
class Foo {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
...
|
||||
...
|
||||
};
|
||||
class FooContainer {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue