diff --git a/SWIG/CHANGES.current b/SWIG/CHANGES.current index c2354428e..525af668b 100644 --- a/SWIG/CHANGES.current +++ b/SWIG/CHANGES.current @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ -Version 1.3.27 (October 15, 2005) -================================= +Unreleased changes +================== + +10/30/2005: mkoeppe + [Guile] Make declared and defined linkage of SWIG_init consistent. + Reported by Steven G. Johnson (SF patch 1315498). 10/26/2005: mmatus @@ -221,85 +225,3 @@ Version 1.3.27 (October 15, 2005) the old expected behavior, specially in ruby and tcl. - -10/15/2005: wsfulton - [Java] Fix for typesafe enum wrapping so that it is possible to - overload a method with 2 different enum types. - -10/15/2005: wsfulton - Fix for %feature("immutable","0") attempting to generate setters - for constants. - - Restored %immutable and %makedefault to clear the feature as it - behaved in SWIG-1.3.25 and earlier. - -10/14/2005: mmatus - Fix bug in anonymous typedef structures which was leading to - strange behaviour. - -10/13/2005: mmatus - Several minor changes: - - - Improve the wchar_t type support - - Add a warning for when you define the 'in' typemap but - you don't define the 'typecheck' one. Very common mistake. - - Add proper default rule for function pointers, now you - can define a typemap such as: - - %typemap(in) SWIGTYPE ((*)(ANY)) {...} - - That will apply to all the pointer to functions. The - rule in C++ also apply to the function 'reference', ie, - in both cases - - typedef int (*fptr)(int a); - typedef int (func)(int a); - - This was needed since it seems to be 'illegal' in C++ to - do something like: - - void *ptr = static_cast(fptr); - - and probably, as for member functions, it is not - warrantied that the pointer sizes will match. - - - Add the #error/#warning directives to swig's cpp. - - - Add the noblock option for typemaps, which is used as - follows: supposed you a typemap, like this - - - %typemap(in,noblock=1) Hello { - .... - } - - then the typemap will be inserted without the block - imposed by the brackets, similar to - - %typemap(in) Hello "..."; - - So, why you don't just use the quote style?, because: - - 1.- The quote style doesn't get preprocessed, for example - - %typemap(in) Hello "$1= SWIG_macro($1);"; - - here, SWIG_macro doesn't get expanded - - 2.- Inside a quote typemap, you have to use - quotes carefully - - %typemap(in) Hello "$1 = \"hello\" "; - - 3.- You can't make emacs and/or other editors - to indent inside a string!. - - - So, why do you want to remove the block?, because an extra - block when not needed (no local variables in it): - - 1.- makes the code harder to read - 2.- makes the code larger - 3.- or in short, for the same reason we have the quote style. - -