strange cache effect, disable by now, see enum_template.i

git-svn-id: https://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/swig/trunk@6340 626c5289-ae23-0410-ae9c-e8d60b6d4f22

SWIG/Examples/test-suite/common.mk

@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ CPP_TEST_CASES += \
 	enum_plus \
 	enum_scope \
 	enum_scope_template \
+	enum_template \
 	enum_thorough \
 	enum_var \
 	evil_diamond \

SWIG/Examples/test-suite/enum_template.i

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+%module enum_template
+
+/*
+From bug report 992329:
+
+In Python I see
+
+>>> import enum_template
+>>> enum_template.MakeETest()
+'_60561408_p_ETest'
+>>> enum_template.TakeETest(0)
+Traceback (most recent call last):
+File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
+TypeError: Expected a pointer
+
+Without the %template, things work fine: the first
+function call returns an integer, and the second
+succeeds.
+*/
+
+%inline %{
+
+enum ETest
+{
+eTest0,
+eTest1,
+eTest2
+};
+
+void TakeETest(ETest test) {};
+ETest MakeETest(void) {return eTest1;};
+
+template<class T> class CTempl
+{
+};
+
+%}
+
+%template(CTempl_ETest) CTempl<ETest>;

SWIG/Examples/test-suite/python/enum_template_runme.py

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+import enum_template
+if enum_template.MakeETest() != 1:
+  raise RuntimeError
+
+if enum_template.TakeETest(0) != None:
+  raise RuntimeError
+  

SWIG/Source/Swig/stype.c

@@ -342,7 +342,8 @@ SwigType *SwigType_default(SwigType *t) {
     def = NewString("SWIGTYPE");
   }
   if (r != t) Delete(r);
-  Setattr(default_cache,t,Copy(def));
+  /* The cache produces strange results, see enum_template.i case */
+  /* Setattr(default_cache,t,Copy(def)); */
   if (Strcmp(def,t) == 0) {
     Delete(def);
     def = 0;