Let cpp_basic unit test pass without method pointers support

This was the only part of the test that didn't work, test at least the rest of
it.

Examples/test-suite/c/Makefile.in

@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ FAILING_CPP_TESTS := \
     class_ignore \
     class_scope_weird \
     constant_pointers \
-    cpp_basic \
     cpp_basic_global_var_built_in \
     cpp_basic_template_function \
     cpp_namespace \

Examples/test-suite/c/cpp_basic_runme.c

@@ -83,13 +83,15 @@ int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
 	Bar_global_fval_set(f);
 	assert(Foo_num_get(Bar_global_fval_get()) == 7);
 
-	// test getting, setting and calling function pointers
+	// getting, setting and calling function pointers isn't supported yet
-	SWIG_CPP_FP func1 = get_func1_ptr();
+#if 0
+	SomeTypeForMemFnPtr func1 = _wrap_get_func1_ptr();
 	Foo_func_ptr_set(f, func1);
-	assert(test_func_ptr(f, 2) == 28);
+	assert(_wrap_test_func_ptr(f, 2) == 28);
-	SWIG_CPP_FP func2 = get_func2_ptr();
+	SomeTypeForMemFnPtr func2 = _wrap_get_func2_ptr();
 	Foo_func_ptr_set(f, func2);
-	assert(test_func_ptr(f, 2) == -14);
+	assert(_wrap_test_func_ptr(f, 2) == -14);
+#endif
 
 	delete_Bar(b);
 	delete_Foo(f);
@@ -104,4 +106,4 @@ int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
 	w = 0;
 
 	return 0;
-}
+}

Examples/test-suite/cpp_basic.i

@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ class Foo {
       return -a*num;
     }
     
+#ifndef SWIGC
     int (Foo::*func_ptr)(int);
+#endif // SWIGC
 
     const char* __str__() const { return "Foo"; }
 };
@@ -87,6 +89,7 @@ Foo Bar::global_fval = Foo(3);
 %}
 
 /* member function tests */
+#ifndef SWIGC
 %inline %{
 int (Foo::*get_func1_ptr())(int) {
   return &Foo::func1;
@@ -101,6 +104,7 @@ int test_func_ptr(Foo *f, int a) {
 }
 
 %}
+#endif // SWIGC
 
 
 #ifdef __cplusplus