jyapayne/swig
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

More consistent formatting of examples in documentation

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
William S Fulton 2017-07-30 13:56:47 +01:00
commit 8052211ac5
6 changed files with 76 additions and 77 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

26
Doc/Manual/SWIGPlus.html
View file

@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ public:
class Spam {
public:
Foo *value;
...
Foo *value;
...
};
</pre>
</div>
@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ public:
class Grok : public Bar {
public:
Grok(); // Not wrapped. No implementation of abstract spam().
Grok(); // Not wrapped. No implementation of abstract spam().
};
</pre>
</div>
@ -4915,19 +4915,19 @@ base classes. For example:
<pre>
class Foo {
public:
int blah(int x);
int blah(int x);
};
class Bar {
public:
double blah(double x);
double blah(double x);
};
class FooBar : public Foo, public Bar {
public:
using Foo::blah;
using Bar::blah;
char *blah(const char *x);
using Foo::blah;
using Bar::blah;
char *blah(const char *x);
};
</pre>
</div>
@ -5008,14 +5008,14 @@ correctly, you can always change the interface to the following:
class FooBar : public Foo, public Bar {
public:
#ifndef SWIG
using Foo::blah;
using Bar::blah;
using Foo::blah;
using Bar::blah;
#else
int blah(int x); // explicitly tell SWIG about other declarations
double blah(double x);
int blah(int x); // explicitly tell SWIG about other declarations
double blah(double x);
#endif
char *blah(const char *x);
char *blah(const char *x);
};
</pre>
</div>