Update for new runtime library approach (no more -runtime -noruntime)

Comment about inline destructors needed for some compilers added


git-svn-id: https://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/swig/trunk/SWIG@6535 626c5289-ae23-0410-ae9c-e8d60b6d4f22

Examples/python/import_template/.cvsignore

@@ -2,12 +2,10 @@ bar.py
 base.py
 foo.py
 spam.py
-runtime.py
 bar.pyc
 base.pyc
 foo.pyc
 spam.pyc
-runtime.pyc
 *_wrap.c
 *_wrap.cxx
 *.dll

Examples/python/import_template/Makefile

@@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ all::
 
 clean::
 	$(MAKE) -f $(TOP)/Makefile python_clean
-	@rm -f foo.py bar.py spam.py base.py runtime.py
+	@rm -f foo.py bar.py spam.py base.py
 
 check: all

Examples/python/import_template/README

@@ -13,12 +13,15 @@ a separate C++ class.
      bar.i      -  Bar class derived from Base
      spam.i     -  Spam class derived from Bar
 
-Each module used %import to refer to another module.  For
+Each module uses %import to refer to another module.  For
 example, the 'foo.i' module uses '%import base.i' to get
 definitions for its base class.
 
-If everything is okay, all of the modules will load correctly and
-type checking will work correctly.
+If everything is okay, all of the modules will load properly and
+type checking will work correctly. Caveat: Some compilers, for example
+gcc-3.2.x, generate broken vtables with the inline methods in this test.
+This is not a SWIG problem and can usually be solved with non-inlined
+destructors compiled into separate shared objects/DLLs.
 
 Unix:
 -----