Fix unrestricted unions testcase and add runtime example
git-svn-id: https://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/swig/branches/gsoc2009-matevz@13849 626c5289-ae23-0410-ae9c-e8d60b6d4f22
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c2a1abd6b
commit
e25da884cb
4 changed files with 4061 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -439,19 +439,24 @@ typedef void (*PFD)(double); // The old style
|
|||
|
||||
<p>SWIG fully supports any type inside a union even if it does not
|
||||
define a trivial constructor. For example, the wrapper for the following
|
||||
code is correctly produced:</p>
|
||||
code correctly provides access to all members in the union:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<div class="code"><pre>
|
||||
struct point {
|
||||
point() {}
|
||||
point(int x, int y): x_(x), y_(y) {}
|
||||
point(int x, int y) : x_(x), y_(y) {}
|
||||
int x_, y_;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#include <new> // For placement 'new' in the constructor below
|
||||
union P {
|
||||
int z;
|
||||
double w;
|
||||
point p; // Illegal in C++; point has a non-trivial constructor. However, this is legal in C++0x.
|
||||
point p; // Illegal in C++03; legal in C++11.
|
||||
// Due to the point member, a constructor definition is required.
|
||||
P() {
|
||||
new(&p) point();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} p1;
|
||||
</pre></div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue