From e69a11d0302a3837497c47cf4afe993a015a3b52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Beazley Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:48:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] *** empty log message *** git-svn-id: https://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/swig/trunk/SWIG@5566 626c5289-ae23-0410-ae9c-e8d60b6d4f22 --- CHANGES.current | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/CHANGES.current b/CHANGES.current index 91fcc0b1f..f4da94c11 100644 --- a/CHANGES.current +++ b/CHANGES.current @@ -1,5 +1,26 @@ Version 1.3.20 (In progress) ============================ +12/14/2003: beazley + Weakened warning message related to constructor names so that an + unusual nested-class wrapping technique would work again (apparently + it worked in some older SWIG releases). For example: + + class Scope { + class ClassA; + class ClassB; + }; + class Scope::ClassA { + ... + }; + class Scope::ClassB { + ... + } + + Note: There is still some odd interaction with the SWIG symbol + table/type system that will need to be looked at in a future release. + Reported by Gustavo Niemeyer. + + 12/11/2003: cheetah (William Fulton) [Java] Protected class methods are wrapped as protected Java methods when using the dirprot director feature. This can be changed using