From eefaef3bdbd1bf6dda0d45dcce17540849857a64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William S Fulton
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:08:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add link for const sections
git-svn-id: https://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/swig/trunk@11795 626c5289-ae23-0410-ae9c-e8d60b6d4f22
---
Doc/Manual/SWIG.html | 6 ++++++
Doc/Manual/SWIGPlus.html | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Doc/Manual/SWIG.html b/Doc/Manual/SWIG.html
index 5b6b6410e..02d0ca3a4 100644
--- a/Doc/Manual/SWIG.html
+++ b/Doc/Manual/SWIG.html
@@ -797,6 +797,12 @@ In this case, the pointer e can change---it's only the value
being pointed to that is read-only.
+
+Please note that for const parameters or return types used in a function, SWIG pretty much ignores
+the fact that these are const, see the section on const-correctness
+for more information.
+
+
Compatibility Note: One reason for changing SWIG to handle
const declarations as read-only variables is that there are
diff --git a/Doc/Manual/SWIGPlus.html b/Doc/Manual/SWIGPlus.html
index 3836c86a7..8e051a0ec 100644
--- a/Doc/Manual/SWIGPlus.html
+++ b/Doc/Manual/SWIGPlus.html
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
Smart pointers and operator->()
Using declarations and inheritance
Nested classes
-A brief rant about const-correctness
+A brief rant about const-correctness
Where to go for more information
@@ -4835,7 +4835,7 @@ Nested class warnings could also not be suppressed using %warnfilter.
-6.27 A brief rant about const-correctness
+6.27 A brief rant about const-correctness