Remove warning SWIGWARN_CPP11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATE which was issued if more
than one argument was used for a variadic template.
SwigType enhancement: 'v.' now represents a variadic argument.
Previously, specifying more than one simple template template parameter
resulted in a parse error. Now multiple template template parameters are
working including instantiation with %template. Example:
template <template<template<class> class, class> class Op, template<class> class X, class Y>
class C { ... };
Closes#624Closes#1021
decltype now accepts C++ expressions instead of just an ID, such as:
int i,j;
... decltype(i+j) ...
... decltype(&i) ...
These result in a warning for non-trivial expressions which SWIG cannot evaluate:
Warning 344: Unable to deduce decltype for 'i+j'.
See 'Type Inference' in CPlusPlus.html for workarounds.
Issue #1589
Issue #1590
Problems handling < and > in template parameters are now fixed.
Remove illegal C++ code (template typedefs) - replace with a function
using same template.
Fixes infinite loop due to () brackets in a non-type template
parameter containing an expression
Fixes#2418
Non-trivial expressions are still not qualified properly though.
Fix when using templates with more than one template parameter
and used as an input parameter in a virtual method in a
director class (problem affecting most of the scripting languages).
Fixes#2160
Such as:
class X final {};
This no longer gives a syntax error.
This change has introduced one more shift-reduce conflict in the parser.
with a conflict with a C style variable declaration with name final:
class X final;
resulting in a syntax error (for C++ not C). This is an an unusual style
for C++ code and more typical declarations do work:
X final;
Closes#672
Ensure that SWIG_VERSION is defined both at SWIG-time and in the
generated C/C++ wrapper code (it was only defined in the wrapper
for some target languages previously).
SWIGGO and SWIGJAVASCRIPT are now defined in the generated wrappers
to match behaviour for all other target languages.
Stop defining SWIGVERSION in the wrapper. This only happened as a
side-effect of how SWIG_VERSION was defined but was never documented and
is redundant.
The new testcase also checks that SWIG is defined at SWIG-time but not
in the generated wrapper, and that exactly one of a list of
target-language specific macros is defined.
Fixes#1050
Includes the majority of patch #1484.
Excludes changes in typepass.cxx for specializations which have no effect
on the duplicate_class_name_in_ns testcase, nor the rest of the test-suite.
For implementing full move semantics when passing parameters by value.
Based on SWIGTYPE && and std::unique_ptr typemaps which implement move
semantics.
Added for all languages, but untested for: Go, Ocaml, R, Scilab (and
unlikely to be fully functional for same reasons as for std::unique_ptr
support).
Issue #999
Remove some erroneously added brackets_increment() calls.
Reject <=> in preprocessor expressions with a clear error message (it
seems it isn't supported here - clang and gcc don't at least).
The type returned by `<=>` is not `bool`. We pretend it's
`int` for now, which should work for how it's likely to be used
in constant expressions.
Fixes#1622
Previously these testcases had C++98 fallback versions of the
testcase code to feed to the compiler if it didn't set __cplusplus to a
value which indicated support for the required C++ version, as well as
the C++14 or C++17 code which was fed to SWIG, and also to the compiler
if it was new enough.
This approach allowed some testing of such features with an
older compiler, but it complicates the testcases and not all new
C++ features can be tested in this way (indeed some of the existing
testcases don't fully exercise the feature being tested currently).
C++14 and C++17 support are also much more widespread than they
were 3.5 years ago when this approach was first implemented, so
it makes more sense to switch C++14 and C++17 testcases to require
a suitable compiler, like how C++11 testing always has.
Support running testcases conditional on the compiler supporting
a each language version, like we already handle C++11.
Currently no testcases are actually run in this way for these
newer language versions.
Change these typemaps to assume that after a function call,
the parameter has been moved. The parameter's proxy class
that owns the C++ object thus has the underlying pointer set
to null so the object cannot be used again and the object is deleted.
Scrap new javarelease typemap and move contents into javabody typemap.
Enhance SWIGTYPE "out" typemaps to use std::move when copying
objects, thereby making use of move semantics when wrapping a function returning
by value if the returned type supports move semantics.
Wrapping functions that return move only types 'by value' now work out the box
without having to provide custom typemaps.
The implementation removed all casts in the "out" typemaps to allow the compiler to
appropriately choose calling a move constructor, where possible, otherwise a copy
constructor. The implementation alsoand required modifying SwigValueWrapper to
change a cast operator from:
SwigValueWrapper::operator T&() const;
to
#if __cplusplus >=201103L
SwigValueWrapper::operator T&&() const;
#else
SwigValueWrapper::operator T&() const;
#endif
This is not backwards compatible for C++11 and later when using the valuewrapper feature
if a cast is explicitly being made in user supplied "out" typemaps. Suggested change
in custom "out" typemaps for C++11 and later code:
1. Try remove the cast altogether to let the compiler use an appropriate implicit cast.
2. Change the cast, for example, from static_cast<X &> to static_cast<X &&>, using the
__cplusplus macro if all versions of C++ need to be supported.
Issue #999Closes#1044
More about the commit:
Added some missing "varout" typemaps for Ocaml which was falling back to
use "out" typemaps as they were missing.
Ruby std::set fix for SwigValueWrapper C++11 changes.
If a "docstring" feature is present it will still override a Doxygen comment.
If the "autodoc" feature is also present, the combined "autodoc" and "docstring"
will override the Doxygen comment. If no "docstring" is present then the
"autodoc" feature will not be generated when there is a Doxygen comment.
This way the "autodoc" feature can be specified and used to provide documentation
for 'missing' Doxygen comments.
Closes#1635
Types generated with and without -builtin are not compatible. Mixing
them in a common type list leads to crashes. Avoid this by using
different capsule names: "type_pointer_capsule" without -builtin and
"type_pointer_capsule_builtin" with.
See #1684
When C++ methods are not able to be overloaded in a derived class,
such as when they differ by just const, or the target language
parameters types are identical even when the C++ parameter types
are different, SWIG will ignore one of the overloaded methods with
a warning. A %ignore is required to explicitly ignore one of the
overloaded methods to avoid the warning message. Methods added
in the derived classes due to one of the %interface macros are now
similarly ignored/not added to the derived class.
The adding of additional methods into the parse tree is now more
robust and complete resulting in support for %feature and %rename
for the added methods.
Closes#1277
Segfault was actually avoided in previous commit ab23cb29.
This commit makes handling more robust in the event of
using %ignore just on the derived method, not tested as it is not
what one should do with directors, and possibly other cases.
Go still segfaults with the new testcase director_using_member_scopes.i.
Issue #1441.
Fix using declaration in derived class incorrectly introducing a method
from a base class when the using declaration is declared before the method
declaration. Problem occurred when within a namespace and the parameter types
in the method signatures were not fully qualified.
Issue #1441
Test both abstract and concrete base classes, with simple int/bool data.
This level of complexity is very helpful when setting up director
functionality for a new target language.
Even in the case of just creating a `DerivedClass` this test says:
```
swig/python detected a memory leak of type 'DerivedClass *', no destructor found.
```
even though the destructor is defined in the base class.
Tests that the `%contract` code (viz., each target language's
implementation of SWIG_contract_assert) compiles in C as expected. Update
the note in the source code since `%contract` is in the official
documentation.
Adding full support for these in expressions seems hard to do without
introducing conflicts into the parser grammar, but in fact all reported
cases have had parentheses around the comparison and we can support that
with a few restrictions on the left side of `<`.
Fixes#80 and #635. Also https://sourceforge.net/p/swig/bugs/1139/
