959e627208
The scoping rules around %template have been specified and enforced.
The %template directive for a class template is the equivalent to an
explicit instantiation of a C++ class template. The scope for a valid
%template instantiation is now the same as the scope required for a
valid explicit instantiation of a C++ template. A definition of the
template for the explicit instantiation must be in scope where the
instantiation is declared and must not be enclosed within a different
namespace.
For example, a few %template and explicit instantiations of std::vector
are shown below:
// valid
namespace std {
%template(vin) vector<int>;
template class vector<int>;
}
// valid
using namespace std;
%template(vin) vector<int>;
template class vector<int>;
// valid
using std::vector;
%template(vin) vector<int>;
template class vector<int>;
// ill-formed
namespace unrelated {
using std::vector;
%template(vin) vector<int>;
template class vector<int>;
}
// ill-formed
namespace unrelated {
using namespace std;
%template(vin) vector<int>;
template class vector<int>;
}
// ill-formed
namespace unrelated {
namespace std {
%template(vin) vector<int>;
template class vector<int>;
}
}
// ill-formed
namespace unrelated {
%template(vin) std::vector<int>;
template class std::vector<int>;
}
When the scope is incorrect, an error now occurs such as:
cpp_template_scope.i:34: Error: 'vector' resolves to 'std::vector' and
was incorrectly instantiated in scope 'unrelated' instead of within scope 'std'.
Previously SWIG accepted the ill-formed examples above but this led to
numerous subtle template scope problems especially in the presence of
using declarations and using directives as well as with %feature and %typemap.
Actually, a valid instantiation is one which conforms to the C++03
standard as C++11 made a change to disallow using declarations and
using directives to find a template.
// valid C++03, ill-formed C++11
using std::vector;
template class vector<int>;
Similar fixes for defining classes using forward class references have
also been put in place. For example:
namespace Space1 {
struct A;
}
namespace Space2 {
struct Space1::A {
void x();
}
}
will now error out with:
cpp_class_definition.i:5: Error: 'Space1::A' resolves to 'Space1::A' and
was incorrectly instantiated in scope 'Space2' instead of within scope 'Space1'.
79 lines
1 KiB
OpenEdge ABL
79 lines
1 KiB
OpenEdge ABL
|
|
%module smart_pointer_namespace2
|
|
%{
|
|
namespace one
|
|
{
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
class Ptr
|
|
{
|
|
T* p;
|
|
public:
|
|
Ptr(T *tp) : p(tp) {}
|
|
~Ptr() { };
|
|
T* operator->() { return p; }
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
namespace one
|
|
{
|
|
class Obj1
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
Obj1() {}
|
|
void donothing() {}
|
|
};
|
|
typedef one::Ptr<Obj1> Obj1_ptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace two
|
|
{
|
|
class Obj2
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
Obj2() {}
|
|
void donothing() {}
|
|
};
|
|
typedef one::Ptr<Obj2> Obj2_ptr;
|
|
}
|
|
%}
|
|
|
|
namespace one
|
|
{
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
class Ptr
|
|
{
|
|
T* p;
|
|
public:
|
|
Ptr(T *tp) : p(tp) {}
|
|
~Ptr() { };
|
|
T* operator->() { return p; }
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace one
|
|
{
|
|
class Obj1
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
Obj1() {}
|
|
void donothing() {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
typedef one::Ptr<Obj1> Obj1_ptr;
|
|
%template(Obj1_ptr) one::Ptr<Obj1>;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace two
|
|
{
|
|
class Obj2
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
Obj2() {}
|
|
void donothing() {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
typedef one::Ptr<Obj2> Obj2_ptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
using two::Obj2;
|
|
%template(Obj2_ptr) one::Ptr<Obj2>;
|
|
|