swig/Lib/java/std_list.i

226 lines
6.6 KiB
OpenEdge ABL

%include <std_common.i>
%include <autobox.i>
%{
#include <list>
#include <algorithm>
%}
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::begin "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::insert "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::set "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::previous_index "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::next_index "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::previous "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::next "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::deref "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::advance "private";
%javamethodmodifiers std::list::has_next "private";
/*
To conform to Java Collection interface we must return int from size().
Unfortunately that loses precision from the integer types commonly used in
C++ implementations. Since we can't overload on return values the best
workaround here is to expose the real C++ size() return value to Java as a
long and use the javaout typemap to validate. We can then at least fails
gracefully in the case where we have a collection with > 2^31-1 items rather
than failing mysteriously.
The use of SWIG_list_size_type here allows us to selectively %apply this to
only the cases where we have to conform to the Java interface requirement,
without interfering with other size_type usage. The intention is that
SWIG_list_size_type is both reserved and unique. (Perhaps it could live in
std_common.i later on?)
*/
%typemap(jstype) SWIG_list_size_type "int";
%typemap(javaout) SWIG_list_size_type {
final long result = $jnicall;
if (result > Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Size of Collection is not representable as int");
}
return (int)result;
}
// Match Java style better:
%rename(Iterator) std::list::iterator;
%nodefaultctor std::list::iterator;
namespace std {
template <typename T> class list {
public:
typedef size_t size_type;
typedef T value_type;
typedef T& reference;
%apply SWIG_list_size_type { size_type next_index, size_type previous_index, size_type size };
/*
* We'd actually be better off having the nested class *not* be static in the wrapper
* output, but this doesn't actually remove the $static from the nested class still.
* (This would allow us to somewhat simplify the implementation of the ListIterator
* interface and give "natural" semantics to Java users of the C++ iterator)
*/
//%typemap(javaclassmodifiers) iterator "public class"
//%typemap(javainterfaces) iterator "ListIterator<$typemap(autobox,$1_basetype::value_type)>"
struct iterator {
%extend {
void set_unchecked(const value_type& v) {
**$self = v;
}
iterator next_unchecked() const {
std::list<T>::iterator ret=*$self;
++ret;
return ret;
}
iterator previous_unchecked() const {
std::list<T>::iterator ret=*$self;
--ret;
return ret;
}
value_type deref_unchecked() const {
return **$self;
}
iterator advance_unchecked(const size_type index) const {
std::list<T>::iterator ret=*$self;
std::advance(ret, index);
return ret;
}
}
};
void assign(size_type n, const value_type &val);
bool empty() const;
list(size_type n, const value_type &value=value_type());
list(const list &o);
list();
~list();
size_type max_size () const;
void pop_back();
void pop_front();
void push_back(const value_type &x);
void push_front(const value_type &x);
size_type size() const;
// Although sort() is nice it makes operator<() mandatory which it probably shouldn't be
//void sort();
iterator begin();
iterator end();
iterator insert(iterator pos, const value_type &v);
%extend {
size_type previous_index(const iterator& pos) const {
return pos == self->begin() ? -1 : std::distance(self->begin(), static_cast<std::list<T>::const_iterator>(pos));
}
size_type next_index(const iterator& pos) const {
return pos == self->end() ? self->size() : std::distance(self->begin(), static_cast<std::list<T>::const_iterator>(pos));
}
bool has_next(const iterator& pos) const {
return pos != $self->end();
}
}
};
}
%typemap(javaimports) std::list %{
import java.util.AbstractSequentialList;
import java.util.ListIterator;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import java.util.Collection;
%}
%typemap(javabase) std::list "AbstractSequentialList<$typemap(autobox,$1_basetype::value_type)>"
#define JAVA_VALUE_TYPE $typemap(autobox,$1_basetype::value_type)
#define JAVA_ITERATOR_TYPE Iterator
%typemap(javacode,noblock=1) std::list {
public $javaclassname(Collection c) {
this();
ListIterator<JAVA_VALUE_TYPE> it = listIterator(0);
// We should special case the "copy constructor" here to avoid lots of cross-language calls
for (Object o: c) {
it.add((JAVA_VALUE_TYPE)o);
}
}
public ListIterator<JAVA_VALUE_TYPE> listIterator(int index) {
return new ListIterator<JAVA_VALUE_TYPE>() {
private JAVA_ITERATOR_TYPE pos;
private JAVA_ITERATOR_TYPE last;
private ListIterator<JAVA_VALUE_TYPE> init(int index) {
pos = $javaclassname.this.begin();
pos = pos.advance_unchecked(index);
return this;
}
public void add(JAVA_VALUE_TYPE v) {
// Technically we can invalidate last here, but this makes more sense
last=$javaclassname.this.insert(pos, v);
}
public void set(JAVA_VALUE_TYPE v) {
if (null==last) {
throw new IllegalStateException();
}
last.set_unchecked(v);
}
public void remove() {
if (null==last) {
throw new IllegalStateException();
}
$javaclassname.this.remove(last);
last=null;
}
public int previousIndex() {
return $javaclassname.this.previous_index(pos);
}
public int nextIndex() {
return $javaclassname.this.next_index(pos);
}
public JAVA_VALUE_TYPE previous() {
if (previousIndex() < 0) {
throw new NoSuchElementException();
}
last = pos;
pos = pos.previous_unchecked();
return last.deref_unchecked();
}
public JAVA_VALUE_TYPE next() {
if (!hasNext()) {
throw new NoSuchElementException();
}
last = pos;
pos = pos.next_unchecked();
return last.deref_unchecked();
}
public boolean hasPrevious() {
// This call to previousIndex() will be much slower than the hasNext() implementation, but it's simpler like this with C++ forward iterators
return previousIndex() != -1;
}
public boolean hasNext() {
return $javaclassname.this.has_next(pos);
}
}.init(index);
}
}